LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Virtual Interfaces?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Virtual Interfaces?
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:10:04 +0900
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:59:38AM -0800, ntadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > THere is a new IPaddr2 script in the heartbeat CVS tree that
> > used ip rather than ifconfig. That should resolve that problem.
> >
> > Though, please double check that you really need to failover
> > that many addresses. If they are on blocks of contigious addresses
> > then you can just route them to a single VIP.
> 
> Horms,
> 
>   Yes, I have actually just tested the failover with a fully upgraded LVS
> system using the IPaddr2 script and instead of causing hurtful multiple
> minutes of downtime it finished the failover in under 3 minutes and appears
> to be functioning as well or better then it did before.  Unfortunately we do
> need to failover this many addresses as we are an ISP and we host 1000+ web
> sites and several thousand email accounts for hundreds of domains.  We use a
> mix of Micro$oft and Linux platforms and their various technologies.  It's a
> complicated mess and we are still in the process of concatenating services
> from multiple purchases we have made as a company.  When we are all done
> with this process it is very possible that all of the services will fit
> within a couple of small ranges but for now.. 'tis the only way.. ;)

Sure, obviously you understand your network much better than I.
I just wanted to be sure that you really needed to do this - which 
as you would notice is quite slow. Obviously you do and its all good.

I am glad to hear that the IPaddr2 script is working well for you.
It has been something that has been needed for a while but was only
recently added to the tree. If you have any problems with/ improvements
for it, please send them send them along to the linux-ha-dev mailing
list[1].

[1] http://www.linux-ha.org/contact/

-- 
Horms
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>