Re: Default GW on director (lvs-dr)

lvs-users

Re: Default GW on director (lvs-dr)

To:	"LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: Default GW on director (lvs-dr)
From:	Simon Young <simon-lvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 22 Dec 2003 11:31:44 +0000

On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 06:45:36AM -0500, Joseph Mack wrote:
> Simon Young wrote:
> 
> > Is there any harm in setting up a default gateway on
> > the director using lvs-dr?
> 
> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-DR.html#Pearthree

Thanks, Joe. And apologies - should have spotted this myself.

Simon.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Default GW on director (lvs-dr), Simon Young Re: Default GW on director (lvs-dr), Joseph Mack Re: Default GW on director (lvs-dr), Simon Young <= Re: Default GW on director (lvs-dr), Joseph Mack

Previous by Date:	Re: why my ipvsadm display nothing?but it can work!, Roberto Nibali
Next by Date:	Re: why my ipvsadm display nothing?but it can work!, Joseph Mack
Previous by Thread:	Re: Default GW on director (lvs-dr), Joseph Mack
Next by Thread:	Re: Default GW on director (lvs-dr), Joseph Mack
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]