RE: problem moving LVS NAT cluster to iptables

To:	"LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: problem moving LVS NAT cluster to iptables - solved?
From:	"Peter Mueller" <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 18 May 2004 11:23:18 -0700

> Now we have to update the kernel 2.2 box, because it was running on a 
> Redhat 7.0 box, and Redhat has since terminated
> support for any release <= 9.0

http://www.fedoralegacy.org/

> We have moved all company servers to Redhat RHEL 3, or to a free clone
> of it, which uses the 2.4 kernel. 

There is a scientific version that just got released.  I had thought it
was FermiLab, but I can't seem to find that version.  The one that I've
been using is whitebox - http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/.  It works very
well, except for the default yum servers being too slow.

P

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: problem moving LVS NAT cluster to iptables - solved?, Peter Mueller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Can you change the destination port in DR mode ?, Joseph Mack
Next by Date:	Re: problem moving LVS NAT cluster to iptables - solved?, Alois Treindl
Previous by Thread:	[no subject], Sean Roe
Next by Thread:	Erroneous RSTs and temporary intermittent loss of service, James Bromberger
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

RE: problem moving LVS NAT cluster to iptables - solved?