LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Keepalived keeps forcing new elections

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Keepalived keeps forcing new elections
From: Alexandre Cassen <Alexandre.Cassen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 23:31:30 +0200
Hi Brad,

fw1 is set as backup and priority of 250
keepalived version 1.1.7 kernel 2.4.20
fw2 is set as master and priority of 255
keepalived 1.1.6 patched kernel 2.4.25

the keepalived boxes do roughly 14Mb/s please let me know if anyone wants any
more information about these servers. I am not sure why they started to do this but restarting keepalived on both boxes did nothing. I had to shutdown fw1 box
and restart keepalived on fw2 to get it to work properly again.  as soon as I
did this and confirmed everything was still working I plugged back in fw1 and
both seem to be working fine now.

?... hmm wired here... in a first step I will answer like constructor customer care : "heu... use the same release of keepalived on your both node" :) a a aa :)

seriously, hmm... never use 255 as priority since this is an VRRP internal value. use value between 1..254. on the receiving point, 255 is synonymous of force master transition which is a special state into the VRRP FSM. Never tested but in a first thought this might be an issue.

best regards,
Alexandre

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>