|
so after making the changes that Alexandre suggested I am still h aving these
same issues. I did however find a server that was flooding FRAGS to another
host on the internet. Im thinking that maybee when it was flooding that some
keepalived multicasts got dropped? any suggestions would be greatly
appreciated or if anyone has experienced these issues I am seeing.
thanks alot
-Brad
Quoting Brad Chang <keepalived@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Alexandre
>
> fw2 has always used 255 as priority. I will upgrade fw2 to 1.1.7 and try
> that
> for a while... but it has been running for weeks without issues..
>
> thanks alot for your input
> -Brad
>
>
> Quoting Alexandre Cassen <Alexandre.Cassen@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Hi Brad,
> >
> > >fw1 is set as backup and priority of 250
> > >keepalived version 1.1.7 kernel 2.4.20
> > >fw2 is set as master and priority of 255
> > >keepalived 1.1.6 patched kernel 2.4.25
> > >
> > >the keepalived boxes do roughly 14Mb/s please let me know if anyone
> wants
> > any
> > >more information about these servers. I am not sure why they started to
>
> > >do this
> > >but restarting keepalived on both boxes did nothing. I had to shutdown
> > >fw1 box
> > >and restart keepalived on fw2 to get it to work properly again. as soon
> as
> > I
> > >did this and confirmed everything was still working I plugged back in
> fw1
> > and
> > >both seem to be working fine now.
> >
> > ?... hmm wired here... in a first step I will answer like constructor
> > customer care : "heu... use the same release of keepalived on your both
> > node" :) a a aa :)
> >
> > seriously, hmm... never use 255 as priority since this is an VRRP internal
>
> > value. use value between 1..254. on the receiving point, 255 is synonymous
>
> > of force master transition which is a special state into the VRRP FSM.
> > Never tested but in a first thought this might be an issue.
> >
> > best regards,
> > Alexandre
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
> -Brad Chang
> -http://www.dotnoc.com
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.dotnoc.com hosting the way it should be.
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
Thanks
-Brad Chang
-http://www.dotnoc.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.dotnoc.com hosting the way it should be.
|
