lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Replacing turboclusterd with LVS |
From: | "Peter Mueller" <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:07:42 -0800 |
> vrrp_instace VI_1 { > virtual_router_id 51 > priority 150 > virtual_ipaddress { > <<<<EDITED>>>> > } > } > > IP numbers and passwords have been edited out... > The section is the same on the secondary except "state" is > set to BACKUP. The backup should also have a lower priority. For example, you could set priority to 100 on the backup if 150 is the master. In general, for VRRP questions please use the excellent IBM redbook. The link is : http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpapers/pdfs/redp3657.pdf. Regards, P |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Replacing turboclusterd with LVS, pmjbf |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Replacing turboclusterd with LVS, pmjbf |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Replacing turboclusterd with LVS, Horms |
Next by Thread: | RE: Replacing turboclusterd with LVS, pmjbf |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |