lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Upgrading systems |
From: | "Peter Mueller" <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:38:37 -0800 |
> However, it may be the deciding factor as to whether or not I open the > can-o-worms. > > Any major changes that would sway me either way? Generally use what you know. Is there a reason you don't like Pirahna? Stick with what works, don't fix what isn't broken, KISS. As for Keepalived & Ultramonkey : they both have their advantages and disadvantages, but Keepalived currently seems like a 'moving target'; lots of ongoing development there. Ultramonkey might be more stable. Your mileage will vary. P |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Trouble setting up LVS/TUN, Joseph Mack |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Trouble setting up LVS/TUN, redirecting decoy |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Upgrading systems, PMilanese |
Next by Thread: | Performance issues with LVS-NAT, Ed Fisher |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |