lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: apachebench not increasing troughput |
From: | Jan Klopper <janklopper@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:36:17 +0100 |
Failover and alive-checks are a bit slow tough. anyway., Thanks, If i have more questions il post them right here. greets Jan Klopper wrote: Mack, I changed the hub (10mbit) to a switch 100mbit (2.5gb backplane)and i see some better transfer rates now (1600 on two servers, no keepalive)However my third server is not being allowed to play, TCP cluster:www wrr -> localhost:www Local 1 0 14108 -> 192.168.12.9:www Route 0 0 0 -> 192.168.12.7:www Route 1 0 14119 -> 192.168.12.8:www Route 1 0 5 As you can see, the last server (192.168.12.9) is down. But the seconds realserver (192.168.12.8) is up and is recognized. It gets a couple of redirects, but not nearly as much as the rest. I restarted ldirectd to see if that would help, but it didn't. Any clue? thanks. Mack.Joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualisation LMIT, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007 Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.john@xxxxxxx lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 03/01/2005 07:28:32 AM:Mack, The director is indeed not forwarding ssh (22),fineHow can i check for persistent connctions on the server side?Someone else will have to help here. I haven't set it up, but when the subject of httpd persistance comes up, people talk about keepalives. I don't know that they are the same thing yet (anyone know?).AB lets me choose wheter or not it should use keepalive connections. (-k Use HTTP KeepAlive feature) If i don;t use it i get 570 pages/sec. If i do use it, i get aprox 1500 pages/sec.consistent with it being the same thing.I have a troughput of 400Kbytes per sec, will test packages soon. (need to let my head/ears rest from the machines buzzing next to me :P)The requested pages are extremely small (13 bytes), but there might be whole lot of http/tcp overhead involved which is not counted inside tht 400Kbytes per seccond amount.yes readhttp://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.performance.html#8000ppsif your packets are all ACKs and 13byte pages, you can saturate your link with very little delivered payload. Joe _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users_______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LVS, Squid and heartbeat ?, Mack . Joseph |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: apachebench not increasing troughput, Mack . Joseph |
Previous by Thread: | Re: apachebench not increasing troughput, Jan Klopper |
Next by Thread: | Re: apachebench not increasing troughput, Mack . Joseph |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |