lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Apache 2.0.53 gone nuts on ldirectord |
From: | Todd Lyons <tlyons@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:29:19 -0800 |
Bosco Lau wanted us to know: >Todd, > >What 'keyword' should I use in the expected search string? Wonder why >changing the search string will cure the problem... Does the filename >of the /GET request matter also? We just changed the checktype to connect, but if you search for the redirect with "OK 302" in our case, it would have worked fine. -- Regards... Todd There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. --Ed Howdershelt Linux kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdkenterprise 1 user, load average: 1.22, 1.26, 1.21 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LVS, Squid and heartbeat ?, Peter Mueller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Mon + LVS for a mysql cluster, Romain Moyne |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Apache 2.0.53 gone nuts on ldirectord, Bosco Lau |
Next by Thread: | Re: Apache 2.0.53 gone nuts on ldirectord, Horms |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |