|
> On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 16:47 +0100, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
> > Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> > > What are the experiences with server pool managers around here?
> > > Which ones are currently known to work best?
> > > keepalived?
> > > ldirectord?
> > > Other?
> > >
> > Both are very good.
> > Ldirectord is very good and easy(ish) to understand...
> > Keepalived is more ambitious... never used it myself but I've heard
very
> > good things...
>
> My main problem is that the previous guy who managed this system
decided
> to make his own pool manager with some shell scripts and crontab.
>
> The obvious problem is the 1m minimum period, which is causing us
> problems.
>
> Since it's a _live_ environment, and extremely critical for us, I'm
wary
> of testing like that. I could really use a few opinions on which is
> better and faster at managing pools.
We're using keepalived with very good results, also in a very
business-critical place.
Currently I'm revamping our setup to the latest versions, testing in
a VMWare setup, and I think you should try that too. You don't really
want to test in a live setup. :-)
Have a nice day
--
Morten Liebach
System Administrator
TELMORE A/S
|
