lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Inconsistent between ipvsadm stats & realserver's |
From: | "Peter Mueller" <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:05:25 -0700 |
> So for LVS-TUN, both the ActiveConn & InActConn counters are > estimated? Or just the InActConn? LVS balances on active connections. I don't know of any schedulers that balance on inactive connections, and certainly not for DR/TUN. BTW for DR/TUN you can try a round-robin scheduler. For us weighted round robin seemed to balance the most effectively. WLC seemed to drift more, most likely for the reasons Joe already replied about. Regards, P |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Inconsistent between ipvsadm stats & realserver's, Son Nguyen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: What are people doing for data sharing between real servers, Randy Paries |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Inconsistent between ipvsadm stats & realserver's, Son Nguyen |
Next by Thread: | RE: Inconsistent between ipvsadm stats & realserver's, Son Nguyen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |