LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: Inconsistent between ipvsadm stats & realserver's

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Inconsistent between ipvsadm stats & realserver's
From: "Peter Mueller" <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:05:25 -0700
> So for LVS-TUN, both the ActiveConn & InActConn counters are 
> estimated? Or just the InActConn?

LVS balances on active connections.  I don't know of any schedulers that
balance on inactive connections, and certainly not for DR/TUN.

BTW for DR/TUN you can try a round-robin scheduler.  For us weighted round
robin seemed to balance the most effectively.  WLC seemed to drift more, most
likely for the reasons Joe already replied about.

Regards,

P

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>