|
Jonathan Tullett wanted us to know:
>95% of the migration went smoothly; no problems at all, however there's
>one service that's still failing: FTP.
>I've got the following modules loaded on the director:
>----------------------------------------------
>Module Size Used by Not tainted
>ipt_MASQUERADE 1464 0 (autoclean)
>ipt_MARK 760 0 (autoclean)
>iptable_mangle 2136 0 (autoclean)
>ip_vs_wlc 612 29 (autoclean)
>ip_vs 51624 30 (autoclean) [ip_vs_wlc]
>iptable_nat 17934 1 (autoclean) [ipt_MASQUERADE]
>ipt_state 536 3 (autoclean)
>ip_conntrack 19972 0 (autoclean) [ipt_MASQUERADE
>iptable_nat ipt_state]
>iptable_filter 1740 1 (autoclean)
>ip_tables 12416 8 [ipt_MASQUERADE ipt_MARK
>iptable_mangle iptable_nat ipt_state iptable_filter]
>tg3 63436 2
>rtc 6440 0 (autoclean)
>----------------------------------------------
No ip_vs_ftp?
I've never done ftp behind a load balancer before, but it seems like
that would be required. That module is available to me on my 2.6.11
kernel, I won't guess as to its availability on your kernel version.
You'll need to take a look.
[todd@tlyons /lib/modules/2.6.11-12mdksmp/kernel/net/ipv4/ipvs]$ ls
`pwd`/ip_vs_ftp.ko.gz
/lib/modules/2.6.11-12mdksmp/kernel/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.ko.gz
--
Regards... Todd
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. --Benjamin Franklin
Linux kernel 2.6.11-12mdksmp 2 users, load average: 1.17, 1.36, 1.35
|
