|
>> can you send a patch, for 2.6 (or 2.4 I can rediff it if you want,
>> but it won't go into that tree) that changes this. I know its
>> trivial but lets practice sign-off procedure. Once we finally
>
> I agree with this procedure, and I shall submit a patch. Unfortunately
> I'm not given the time to do this right now, so this will have to wait.
> OTOH I believe that we should make those read-only TCP state timeout
> tunables in proc-fs read-write. I believe this would make a lot more
> sense, wouldn't it? In fact you've mentioned this before as well.
>
>> work out a solution to the templates problem I'll send some patches
>> upstream, and this can go in the batch.
>
> I see if I can cook up something, it's not that so many people care
> about it anyway, nor is it broken; just suboptimal.
Gulp! That code was already there, just removed from the build. How so?
This patch adds that functionality back. Please apply:
Signed-off-by: Roberto Nibali
Cheers,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
echo
'[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc
|
