lvs-users
|
To: | Roberto Nibali <ratz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] reinstate state transition timer setting in proc-fs (resend v2) |
Cc: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Cc: | Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:56:23 +0200 (EET) |
Hello, On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Roberto Nibali wrote: > So, reading the code a bit more I realise that a basic infrastructure > has been prepared by extending all ip_vs_* structs with int* timeout > hooks. How do you want to solve passing such variable information via > ipvsadm? I would really like to read your proposal on this granular > timeout framework. Here is what i found in sent-mail archives: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/tmp/tt.txt Currently, all protocols provide names for their state, so little support for per-proto timeouts is required in kernel. More code is needed for per-service timeouts or even per-app (it has .timeout_table). But it needs thinking and time. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
Previous by Date: | Re: ipvsadm --set... what does it modify?, Guy Waugh |
---|---|
Next by Date: | outbound nat problem, Rob Ruth |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] reinstate state transition timer setting in proc-fs(resend v2), Roberto Nibali |
Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.4][RFC] hprio scheduler for atomic server pool switching, Horms |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |