LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: lvs for special application

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: lvs for special application
From: Ranga Nathan <kairanga@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:52:57 -0800
From what you state, LVS may not be needed. Other responses have gone into detail. However, just to let you know, there is a Kernel Linux Virtual Server that examines the packets and schedules according to the content. I have not tried it myself and not sure if it is production-grade. Check out this link: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/ktcpvs/ktcpvs.html
Ranga

Andrés Cañada wrote:

I'm figuring out how to make something. Right now, in my configuration, two directors (one master and another backup) uses LVS to balance requests from clients to realservers on a round-robin basis. But I need to setup a configuration that send request for a special aplication to a special realserver (always the same server for this application). This is a web application so when for example a client types in the browser http://ipApplication the director should always send this request to the same realserver
I use ldirectord
Anybody help me?
Thanks!

**NOTA DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD** Este correo electrónico, y en su caso los ficheros adjuntos, pueden contener información protegida para el uso exclusivo de su destinatario. Se prohíbe la distribución, reproducción o cualquier otro tipo de transmisión por parte de otra persona que no sea el destinatario. Si usted recibe por error este correo, se ruega comunicarlo al remitente y borrar el mensaje recibido. **CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE** This email communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the designated recipient named above. Distribution, reproduction or any other use of this transmission by any party other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>