lvs-users
|
To: | Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>, <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Which failover technique? |
From: | Matt Chan <engineuity@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:39:12 -0500 |
On 1/23/06, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > no. read the HOWTO on the packet flow for LVS-DR and > LVS-Tun. I now know a little more about the behind the scenes stuff. :) So after reading chapter 7, the only "output" interface is eth0. > How can you add a route for it? > > as you've done above. > > The packets involved in health checking are independant of > the LVS. The route that I had added was for the VIP, how do you distinguish packets for the LVS and others like healthchecking? -Matt |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Which failover technique?, Joseph Mack NA3T |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Request/Receive negotiation, Dominik Klein |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Which failover technique?, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Next by Thread: | Re: Which failover technique?, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |