LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Which failover technique?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Which failover technique?
From: Matt Chan <engineuity@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:10:50 -0500
On 1/23/06, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Presumably you should be able to add that
> by hand.
>

I had added the route for director1 on dev tunl0
route add x.x.x.208 dev tunl0
I was under the impression that this was to send any packets "back" to
director1 through the tunl interface which is actually going back to the
client. Is this correct? How can you add a route for it? The extra NIC can
solve this problem I hope, I guess i would just have to have an ip on the
same subnet as eth0.

-Matt Chan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>