lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Which failover technique? |
From: | Matt Chan <engineuity@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:10:50 -0500 |
On 1/23/06, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Presumably you should be able to add that > by hand. > I had added the route for director1 on dev tunl0 route add x.x.x.208 dev tunl0 I was under the impression that this was to send any packets "back" to director1 through the tunl interface which is actually going back to the client. Is this correct? How can you add a route for it? The extra NIC can solve this problem I hope, I guess i would just have to have an ip on the same subnet as eth0. -Matt Chan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: poor man's LocalNode, Daniel Borca |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Request/Receive negotiation, Mark |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Which failover technique?, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Next by Thread: | Re: Which failover technique?, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |