LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: problems adding a new real server

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: problems adding a new real server
From: Roberto Nibali <ratz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 09:45:09 +0100
Randy,

Thanks for the help

Sure, no deal ;).

not sure what "FIB" is

FIB: forward information base

The point is that the Linux kernel technically (if we're being picky) does not do routing, but forwarding. Routing is originally rather used in conjunction with dynamic packet forwarding based on a router protocol, such as RIP or OSPF or any other.

Since we use tools like route or ip route to set up "routes" and even in the kernel we have a route.c, it's become customary to refer to routing as well when we speak of a Linux host (or router) forwarding packets from one network to another one.

my config is 1 director and 3 real servers

i have had 192.168.0.203 and 192.168.0.204 running for quite a while
and i am trying to add a third 192.168.0.159

Ok.

203 and 204 are rh9 and 159 is fedora 4

I just saw the other thread, yes. And I tend to agree with Graeme on that FC4 might just be a tad bit better regarding performance. Also, is the hardware comparable or completely different to your other servers?

virtual=66.208.187.10:80
        real=192.168.0.203:80 gate
        real=192.168.0.204:80 gate
        real=192.168.0.159:80 gate
        fallback=127.0.0.1:80 gate

And you want to do LVS_DR, not LVS_NAT, correct?

        service=http
        request="ldirectordping.html"
        receive="Test Page"
        scheduler=wlc
        persistent=1800
        netmask=255.255.255.0
        protocol=tcp

So what do you need 66.208.187.240/25 for?

Regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>