LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: problems adding a new real server

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: problems adding a new real server
From: Randy Paries <rtparies@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 03:01:55 -0600
Roberto ,
As u can tell , i am not a network guy.
203 and 204 are identical hardware( 2yrs old) and 159 is brandnew hw

yes i have configured it for LVS_DR

66.208.187.240 is the outgoing ip for the third box.

so how i have it set up is , the incoming ip is 10 and then each of my
real servers have their own public ips. And my C Class is setup in two
<128 and > 128 and that is how we get around the arp problem

it has been working great , but just seem to be struggling getting
this 3rd real server going

Randy

On 2/8/06, Roberto Nibali <ratz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Randy,
>
> > Thanks for the help
>
> Sure, no deal ;).
>
> > not sure what "FIB" is
>
> FIB: forward information base
>
> The point is that the Linux kernel technically (if we're being picky)
> does not do routing, but forwarding. Routing is originally rather used
> in conjunction with dynamic packet forwarding based on a router
> protocol, such as RIP or OSPF or any other.
>
> Since we use tools like route or ip route to set up "routes" and even in
> the kernel we have a route.c, it's become customary to refer to routing
> as well when we speak of a Linux host (or router) forwarding packets
> from one network to another one.
>
> > my config is 1 director and 3 real servers
> >
> > i have had 192.168.0.203 and 192.168.0.204 running for quite a while
> > and i am trying to add a third 192.168.0.159
>
> Ok.
>
> > 203 and 204 are rh9 and 159 is fedora 4
>
> I just saw the other thread, yes. And I tend to agree with Graeme on
> that FC4 might just be a tad bit better regarding performance. Also, is
> the hardware comparable or completely different to your other servers?
>
> > virtual=66.208.187.10:80
> >         real=192.168.0.203:80 gate
> >         real=192.168.0.204:80 gate
> >         real=192.168.0.159:80 gate
> >         fallback=127.0.0.1:80 gate
>
> And you want to do LVS_DR, not LVS_NAT, correct?
>
> >         service=http
> >         request="ldirectordping.html"
> >         receive="Test Page"
> >         scheduler=wlc
> >         persistent=1800
> >         netmask=255.255.255.0
> >         protocol=tcp
>
> So what do you need 66.208.187.240/25 for?
>
> Regards,
> Roberto Nibali, ratz
> --
> echo
> '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>