|
I've done a lot of googling and archive searching, so I've seen the
general fwmark state tracking described. Reading this, it seems like
this patch isn't exactly approved or even obviously available. And
the article is from 2002. :)
I'm also not sure why this seems like such a difficult problem. If
LVS honored routes, there would be no complicated hacks required.
Unless LVS overrides routes, in which case it might be nice to have a
switch to turn off that optimization.
I understand that routes are a subset of the problem fixed by the
patch, and I can see the value of the patch. But for the basic route
case it seems odd for LVS to just dump all outgoing packets to the
default gw. I mean, it could cache the routing table instead of just
a single gw?
Anyway, thoughts appreciated, including a source for a patch that
will apply to a recent ipvs. Or word that it's built-in?
Thanks!
--
Ken.
krb@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mar 14, 2006, at 3:07 AM, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Ken Brownfield wrote:
However, I need to support VIPs on the director that live on two
separate external subnets:
do you know about this
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-
HOWTO.ipvsadm.html#Henrik
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://
www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
