|
drbd+NFS works for me, pretty well too.
check out linux-ha.org for HaNFS i believe. at some point i'll post as
much info/help i can, joe's asked me if i'd like to contribute my
experience and i just have been too busy to document it.
On 4/1/06, Neamtu Dan <dlxneamtu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem with seting up my LVS system and after a week of strugle I
> have decided de ask for some piece of advice from you guys.
> I have a test system made up by a director, 3 servers running ftp and http
> and 2 storage computers from where the servers take their data. If I were to
> stick to one storage computer there would be no problem, but I want
> redundacy. So I've set up a working heartbeat on both the storage computers,
> but when the primary fails the servers can no longer use the data unless the
> servers umount and mount again on the Virtual IP address the heartbeat uses(I
> tryed mounting with nfs and samba so far). As I understand these 2 mounting
> methods will not work in case of failover because of different disk geometry.
> Do you know what I should do for nfs or samba to work in case of failover
> (at least for read only, if read-write on the storage is not possible), or do
> you know any other solution? Do you think it is possible to be done with
> enbd+nfs or samba, or with drbd+nfs or samba? Any suggestion would help.
> Thanks, Dan
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo!
> Messenger with Voice.
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
