LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Problems with IPVS

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Problems with IPVS
From: Roberto Nibali <ratz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 09:08:46 +0200
Sorry, not on my end. Something ate them in between. Could you upload them somewhere zipped?

 http://sp.bi.lt/tcpdumps.zip

Yep, I got them. Funny, if you open them in konqueror, it tries to display the octets in the packets, resulting in a half-backed webpage :). Bloody konqueror is too smart!

 We are trying to be smart :).

I hope not too smart? :)

 On the edge. :)

Definitely, with the kernel versions you're using :).

I slowly get it. You have tried to load balance your WAP connections using LVS, but it did not work and you're now DNAT'ing your mobile phones to a single proxy?

Yes. Just not single proxy. netmask 255.255.0.3 and I'm load balancing to 4 proxies.

Have you considered iproute2 nat? We could get a similar functionality to LVS using stuff like:

ip route add nat 192.168.1.1 via 80.80.80.80
ip rule add nat 192.168.1.1 via 80.80.80.80

ipvsadm -L -n -c

I'm running everything using DNAT now. ipvs would be much better of course. And even now there are 6000 lines of output (wap1 9200:9201 udp traffic is still going through ipvs).

IPVS must work. I don't yet fully understand your setup. See my second email in this thread.

 As I already said few times. IPVS works for everything but SE phones.

Absolutely.

I'll look into this later today,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>