LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Problems with IPVS

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Problems with IPVS
From: Roberto Nibali <ratz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:12:31 +0200
Yep, I got them. Funny, if you open them in konqueror, it tries to display the octets in the packets, resulting in a half-backed webpage :). Bloody konqueror is too smart!

 So what are the results of investigation? ;)

Sorry, haven't been able to look at it yet. I've been moving houses and I was involved in a car accident yesterday and today I've come down with a cold. The laptop with the files is in the car cemetery and police hasn't allowed me to go there yet.

Yes. Just not single proxy. netmask 255.255.0.3 and I'm load balancing to 4 proxies.

Have you considered iproute2 nat? We could get a similar functionality to LVS using stuff like:

ip route add nat 192.168.1.1 via 80.80.80.80
ip rule add nat 192.168.1.1 via 80.80.80.80

 What's the advantage of such method against iptables DNAT?

It's closer to LVS because it's tighter coupled into the routing facility. I understand it better than netfilter code because it's smaller and easier to debug. But that's just me ;).

Best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>