LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Problems with IPVS

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Problems with IPVS
From: "Mindaugas" <mind@xxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:17:37 +0300

Sorry, not on my end. Something ate them in between. Could you upload them somewhere zipped?
 http://sp.bi.lt/tcpdumps.zip
Yep, I got them. Funny, if you open them in konqueror, it tries to 
display the octets in the packets, resulting in a half-backed webpage 
:). Bloody konqueror is too smart!
 So what are the results of investigation? ;)

Yes. Just not single proxy. netmask 255.255.0.3 and I'm load balancing to 4 proxies.
Have you considered iproute2 nat? We could get a similar functionality 
to LVS using stuff like:
ip route add nat 192.168.1.1 via 80.80.80.80
ip rule add nat 192.168.1.1 via 80.80.80.80
 What's the advantage of such method against iptables DNAT?

 Mindaugas


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>