Re: Is LVS still alive?

["howard chen" <howachen@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/5/06, David Lang <dlang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> LVS has been merged into the main kernel so there is no longer a need for
> seperate releases.
>
> it's still alive and still getting updates, but in the normal kernel
> development, not as a seperate patchset.
>
> David Lang
>
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, howard chen wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:55:38 +0800
> > From: howard chen <howachen@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reply-To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
> >     <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Is LVS still alive?
> >
> > the latest release was back to 24-Dec-2004, so I want to ask if  LVS
> > is still alive and continue developing?
> >
> > or in fact thet LVS is VERY mature enough?
> >
> > Thanks...
> > _______________________________________________
> > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
if i want to look at the latest development source, where can i find it?

thanks