|
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, howard chen wrote:
On 12/5/06, David Lang <dlang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
LVS has been merged into the main kernel so there is no longer a need for
seperate releases.
it's still alive and still getting updates, but in the normal kernel
development, not as a seperate patchset.
David Lang
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, howard chen wrote:
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:55:38 +0800
> From: howard chen <howachen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
> <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Is LVS still alive?
>
> the latest release was back to 24-Dec-2004, so I want to ask if LVS
> is still alive and continue developing?
>
> or in fact thet LVS is VERY mature enough?
>
> Thanks...
if i want to look at the latest development source, where can i find it?
I don't follow the LVS development closely enough to say, the patches end up in
the main kernel -rc kernels, but i don't know where development prior to this
takes place.
David Lang
|
