Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer

lvs-users

To:	"LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer
From:	Malcolm <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:05:08 +0000

I would like to figure out a way to get around the need of having to
do anything at all on the reals, much like the way Netscallers behave.


I assume Netscaller is a proxy rather than a router? You could use HAProxy:
http://haproxy.1wt.eu/

Looks like he's working on integrating the Linux Layer7 Switchingproject, as well which can only be good news.


Regards,
Malcolm.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer, (continued) Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer, Philip M Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer, Bill Omer Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer, Rob Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer, Philip M Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer, Bill Omer Using LVS to Load Balance DHCP Requests, Shaun Mccullagh Re: Using LVS to Load Balance DHCP Requests, Rob Re: Using LVS to Load Balance DHCP Requests, Joseph Mack NA3T Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer, Philip M Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer, Bill Omer Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer, Malcolm <= Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer, Joseph Mack NA3T

Previous by Date:	Re: Using LVS to Load Balance DHCP Requests, Joseph Mack NA3T
Next by Date:	Re: custom job scheduling, Joseph Mack NA3T
Previous by Thread:	Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer, Bill Omer
Next by Thread:	Re: Using LVS to replace Netscaler Load Balancer, Joseph Mack NA3T
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]