LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS vs HA Proxy

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS vs HA Proxy
From: "howard chen" <howachen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 01:36:28 +0800
If my need is :

1. DNS load balancing (RR)
2. IP hash based load balancing

LVS is recommended?

in fact, I think a modern server (e.g. P4 2.8GHZ, 512 MB RAM) is
already able to saturated 100MBPS running HA proxy?


Thanks.

On 2/2/07, Malcolm <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
howard chen wrote:
>> From the HA Proxy page:
>
> It said:
>
> Linux Virtual Servers (LVS)
> Very fast layer 3/4 load balancing merged in Linux 2.4 and 2.6
> kernels. Should be coupled with Keepalived to monitor servers. This
> generally is the solution embedded by default in most IP-based load
> balancers.
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>