lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | LVS vs HA Proxy |
From: | "howard chen" <howachen@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 2 Feb 2007 01:16:44 +0800 |
From the HA Proxy page: It said: Linux Virtual Servers (LVS) Very fast layer 3/4 load balancing merged in Linux 2.4 and 2.6 kernels. Should be coupled with Keepalived to monitor servers. This generally is the solution embedded by default in most IP-based load balancers. This does not tell anything abt performance, or stability, anyone want to comments abt this? |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Problems with LVS+heartbeat+ldirectord+iptables w/ SNAT/DNAT, Siim Põder |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LVS vs HA Proxy, Malcolm |
Previous by Thread: | ldirectord: checkinterval global, or per-service?, Guy Waugh |
Next by Thread: | Re: LVS vs HA Proxy, Malcolm |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |