Re: LVS vs HA Proxy

[Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, howard chen wrote:

> If my need is :
>
> 1. DNS load balancing (RR)
> 2. IP hash based load balancing
>
> LVS is recommended?
>
> in fact, I think a modern server (e.g. P4 2.8GHZ, 512 MB RAM) is
> already able to saturated 100MBPS running HA proxy?
a 400MHz CPU is able to saturate 100Mps ethernet if it's 
just routing.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml 
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!