lvs-users
|
To: | LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list. <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] lvs-nat: is it possible to have lvs-nat and lvs-tun with 1 geographically located web server? |
From: | Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:50:38 +0000 |
William The prerequisite for NAT to work is that the return packets from the realservers to clients go back through the director. In DR or TUN you can succeed without this, but the realservers _could_ route back through the director - this just isn't very common. In your case, you could add a "geographic" server to your NAT setup if and only if that server sends all its' responses back through the director. That may, but most likely won't, be possible. Note that your understanding of things as "realservers having to see the CIP" is a bit wrong - they have to have a route to the clients, and it has to go the right way for the connection to succeed. That is to say that the two ends of the connection - the client and the LVS, however configured - need to complete the three way handshake to establish the connection. Graeme. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [lvs-users] lvs-nat: is it possible to have lvs-nat and lvs-tun with 1 geographically located web server?, William Ottley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] lvs-nat: is it possible to have lvs-nat and lvs-tun with 1 geographically located web server?, William Ottley |
Previous by Thread: | [lvs-users] lvs-nat: is it possible to have lvs-nat and lvs-tun with 1 geographically located web server?, William Ottley |
Next by Thread: | [lvs-users] help, added new box now to many InActConn, Randy Paries |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |