|
Hey there Graeme,
Thanks for the input. As I suspected, but in truth, i'm just not that
good with the lvs software.
and I don't have the time to tinker with it :(
thanks again for your input!
William
On Jan 9, 2008 4:50 PM, Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> William
>
> The prerequisite for NAT to work is that the return packets from the
> realservers to clients go back through the director.
>
> In DR or TUN you can succeed without this, but the realservers _could_ route
> back through the director - this just isn't very common.
>
> In your case, you could add a "geographic" server to your NAT setup if and
> only if that server sends all its' responses back through the director. That
> may, but most likely won't, be possible.
>
> Note that your understanding of things as "realservers having to see the CIP"
> is a bit wrong - they have to have a route to the clients, and it has to go
> the right way for the connection to succeed. That is to say that the two ends
> of the connection - the client and the LVS, however configured - need to
> complete the three way handshake to establish the connection.
>
> Graeme.
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
--
---------------
Morpheus: After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill
- the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you
want to believe. You take the red pill - you stay in Wonderland and I
show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes.
|
