lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | [lvs-users] help, added new box now to many InActConn |
From: | "Randy Paries" <rtparies@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:00:27 -0600 |
hello, just rebuilt a box. I went from fc4 to centos. Configured as close to the old one as possible. but i am seeing way to many InActConn Any suggestions on where to start looking? local.flanders:http is the new rebuilt machine # ipvsadm IP Virtual Server version 1.0.10 (size=65536) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn TCP www.unitnet.com:http wlc persistent 1800 mask 255.255.255.0 -> local.flanders:http Route 1 76 3592 -> local.smithers:http Route 1 87 156 -> local.lovejoy:http Route 1 119 89 TCP www.unitnet.com:https wlc persistent 1800 mask 255.255.255.0 -> local.flanders:https Route 1 0 2 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] lvs-nat: is it possible to have lvs-nat and lvs-tun with 1 geographically located web server?, William Ottley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] help, added new box now to many InActConn, Sameer Garg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] lvs-nat: is it possible to have lvs-nat and lvs-tun with 1 geographically located web server?, Graeme Fowler |
Next by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] help, added new box now to many InActConn, Sameer Garg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |