lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] Load balancing outgoing traffic |
From: | Ruben Laban <r.laban@xxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:12:17 +0100 |
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Greg wrote: > Ok, I run it with 16 IPs, and set "209" as default : > > ----count----ip---- > 66 145 > 66 146 > 55 147 > 55 148 > 55 149 > 44 196 > 55 197 > 44 198 > 44 206 > 44 207 > 44 208 > 407 209 > 22 226 > 33 227 > 33 228 > 33 229 > > the default route have really more traffic. I test with a ping flood, > 50000 ping per IP, and have same results... Never really used the nth match myself, but perhaps with some tweaking of its parameters it can be made into a nicer spreading of the ip's used. -- Ruben |
Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] SSL persistence/offloading and IPVS-TUN, Graeme Fowler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR vs. LVS-NAT, Andreas Altenburg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] Load balancing outgoing traffic, Greg |
Next by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] Load balancing outgoing traffic, Michael M. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |