|
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 11:19 +0100, Andreas Altenburg wrote:
> Yes, i understand. But another question: I have problems configuring
> the realserver with one internal (real) IP and the VIP on the lo
> interface (with the director as the gateway of the lo):
OK, step-by-step:
> ifconfig eth1 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
> 192.168.0.255 up
Fine.
> route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth1
Fine.
> ifconfig lo:0 <VIP> netmask 255.255.255.255 broadcast <VIP> up
Fine.
> route add -host <VIP> dev lo:0
You don't need this. If the VIP is already local, no route needs
configuring.
However, I don't see any errors, so I don't understand the problem.
> Where is my mistake? I do not want the real server to have a public IP
> in the same subnet as the VIP on eth0. My VIP is a public IP. Hope,
> you will understand my problem ;-)
I'm not sure I do, no.
For -DR, the realserver _needs_ to have the VIP on a loopback (or other)
alias or it won't be able to create response packets.
Graeme
|
