lvs-users
|
To: | Jack Neely <jjneely@xxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] UDP persistence woes |
Cc: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Michael Pfeuffer <wq5c@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:40:19 -0600 |
Hi Jack, Thanks for the quick reply. Unfortunately, using 'sh' didn't make any difference. FWIW, the test traffic is all coming from the same source address, to that may explain why. --Mike At 10:28 AM 11/18/2008, Jack Neely wrote: >Mike, > >I find the 'sh' scheduling method to work best for UPD traffic... > >Jack Neely |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] UDP persistence woes, Jack Neely |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] UDP persistence woes, Graeme Fowler |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] UDP persistence woes, Jack Neely |
Next by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] UDP persistence woes, Graeme Fowler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |