Re: [lvs-users] Generic UPD "connect" check feature for ldirectord?

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Generic UPD "connect" check feature for ldirectord?
From: Sebastian Vieira <sebvieira@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:05:29 +0100

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Christian Balzer <chibi@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Noting the lack of replies or a native rad-acct check option for
> ldirectord I was wondering why not adding a UDP "connect" service check to
> it? I know it's not as straightforward or reliable as TCP, but in most
> environments it should give much more useful results than "none" or "ping".
> Netcat seems to have no problem figuring out if something is listening on
> an UDP port:

I know this is not exactly what you're asking for, but why not try the new
external check feature?

Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>