|
Hello,
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:05:29 +0100 Sebastian Vieira wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Christian Balzer <chibi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Noting the lack of replies or a native rad-acct check option for
> > ldirectord I was wondering why not adding a UDP "connect" service
> > check to it? I know it's not as straightforward or reliable as TCP,
> > but in most environments it should give much more useful results than
> > "none" or "ping". Netcat seems to have no problem figuring out if
> > something is listening on an UDP port:
>
>
> I know this is not exactly what you're asking for, but why not try the
> new external check feature?
>
New... feature....
ARGH, I was looking at an old (Debian etch) manpage.
The new boxes running lenny indeed have a ldirectord with that feature
listed. Now that should make it really easy and without the need to fondle
stuff that is not under my control.
Thanks a lot for bringing this up!
Regards,
Christian
--
Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer NOC
chibi@xxxxxxx Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Network Services
http://www.gol.com/
https://secure3.gol.com/mod-pl/ols/index.cgi/?intr_id=F-2ECXvzcr6656
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
