On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 09:37 +1000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:35:40PM -0400, Sean Millichamp wrote:
> > This patch adds the ability to notify ldirectord that a system should be
> > forced down for maintenance (or other reasons) even though the service
> > check passes.
> This looks good to me. Though I wonder if it might be
> better to save the results of ld_gethostbyaddr(), perhaps
> at initialisation time. Then again, perhaps not as that
> would stop ldirectord from respecting any DNS changes that
> may occur.
I briefly pondered that. DNS already has opportunities for caching
external to ldirectord: you can run a local caching resolver with
appropriate TTLs or you can run nscd. It seems like a lot of added
complexity for something which could be solved already in another way.
I suspect any site requiring the level of control this option provides
will have the ability and experience to know how to handle the DNS
lookup problem via a local caching resolver or nscd. If this option
isn't enabled it becomes a non-issue as the DNS code never gets called.
Sean
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|