|
Hello Joe.
On 27 April 2010 17:58, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Mark Brooks wrote:
>> Does anyone still maintain the LVS SNMP module
> I forget the original author, and the code has been passed
> from one person to another. If it needs fixing, you'll
> probably have to do it yourself. If you do make changes, can
> you pass them along to at least me, so that they're
> available for the next person?
Attached is a patch for the LVS net-snmp module which appears to fix
the memory leak we were seeing. It's still under test, but results
look good so far.
It's a very simple fix, but in testing we were seeing 400 bytes lost
per snmpwalk.
There's another memory leak in net-snmp v5.5 itself - that's fixed by
applying this patch:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2871747&group_id=12694&atid=312694
Nick.
--
Nick Chalk.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
net-snmp-lvs-module-0.0.4-leak_fix.patch
Description: Text Data
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
