|
Hello Joe.
On 14 May 2010 19:20, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 May 2010, Nick Chalk wrote:
>> It's a very simple fix, but in testing we were seeing 400 bytes lost per
>> snmpwalk.
> thanks for figuring it out. Even simple fixes require you to first find the
> problem.
It did take about five days' digging in net-snmp, the module itself,
libipvs, libnl...
>> There's another memory leak in net-snmp v5.5 itself - that's fixed by
>> applying this patch:
...
> There's two versions of the patch there. I've downloaded both incase they
> disappear off the internet.
Sorry, we used the second patch, net-snmp-trunk-2.patch, and that's
working in our tests.
Nick.
--
Nick Chalk.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
