|
You mean that we can do with separate physical interface with IP specified?
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff <
misch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 September 2010 21:28:51 George Machitidze wrote:
> > Thanks Michael
> >
> > Is this applicable for our LVS server if we are trying to connect *to
> the*
> > *VIP of this LVS server* *from* the *LVS server* itself and there will be
> > no need to change our rules, just an upgrade of kernel?
> >
> > Where can we find the patch for kernel? I don't see any changes in
> mainline
> > *2.6.36-rc6 :(*
> >
> > Currently we use kernel-2.6.34.7-56.fc13.x86_64 (Fedora) with generic
> > patches, we can ask Fedora to include them as fix before 3.6.36 will be
> > included (probably FC14, ~1 month left)
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't know the exact behaviour of netfilter / ipvs on NAT for connections
> from the LVS to the LVS. But why don't you just use the normal, not the
> virtual IP address for such connections?
>
> I also don't know exactly about fedora because I am more familiar with
> debian
> and ubuntu. Perhaps you ask "horms" on the list for details of the patches
> in
> Fedora.
>
> Greetings,
>
> --
> Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
> Guardinistr. 63
> 81375 München
>
> Tel: (0163) 172 50 98
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
--
Best regards,
George Machitidze
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
