LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] postfix problem - lost connection after CONNECT

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] postfix problem - lost connection after CONNECT
From: George Machitidze <giomac@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 01:41:01 +0400
ОК, where I can find the patch so I can you iptables-nat with lvs-nat?

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Michael Schhwartzkopff <
misch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thursday 30 September 2010 21:15:29 George Machitidze wrote:
> > You mean that we can do with separate physical interface with IP
> specified?
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff <
> >
> > misch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 29 September 2010 21:28:51 George Machitidze wrote:
> > > > Thanks Michael
> > > >
> > > > Is this applicable for our LVS server if we are trying to connect *to
> > >
> > > the*
> > >
> > > > *VIP of this LVS server* *from* the *LVS server* itself and there
> will
> > > > be no need to change our rules, just an upgrade of kernel?
> > > >
> > > > Where can we find the patch for kernel? I don't see any changes in
> > >
> > > mainline
> > >
> > > > *2.6.36-rc6 :(*
> > > >
> > > > Currently we use kernel-2.6.34.7-56.fc13.x86_64 (Fedora) with generic
> > > > patches, we can ask Fedora to include them as fix before 3.6.36 will
> be
> > > > included (probably FC14, ~1 month left)
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I don't know the exact behaviour of netfilter / ipvs on NAT for
> > > connections from the LVS to the LVS. But why don't you just use the
> > > normal, not the virtual IP address for such connections?
> > >
> > > I also don't know exactly about fedora because I am more familiar with
> > > debian
> > > and ubuntu. Perhaps you ask "horms" on the list for details of the
> > > patches in
> > > Fedora.
> > >
> > > Greetings,
>
> I mean: My loadbalancers have a dedicated address which is the primary
> address
> of the machine. The VIP Is a secondary IP address on that interface.
>
> All traffic dedicated to the machine itself is addressed to the primary IP
> and
> all traffic that should undergo loadbalancing if addressed to the second
> IP.
>
> Greetings,
>
> --
> Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
> Guardinistr. 63
> 81375 München
>
> Tel: (0163) 172 50 98
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>



-- 
Best regards,
George Machitidze
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>