lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] Why have heartbeat manage ldirectord? |
From: | Kon Wilms <konfoo@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:09:16 -0700 |
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > IMHO, no, its just a matter of taste. Indeed. I don't even use heartbeat. Ucarp works fine for my uses in addition to the fact that it is used by us for other non-ldirector production failover purposes. Cheers Kon _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] Why have heartbeat manage ldirectord?, Simon Horman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] Why have heartbeat manage ldirectord?, Neil Aggarwal |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] Why have heartbeat manage ldirectord?, Simon Horman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] Why have heartbeat manage ldirectord?, Neil Aggarwal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |