LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Why have heartbeat manage ldirectord?

To: "'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Why have heartbeat manage ldirectord?
From: "Neil Aggarwal" <neil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:24:54 -0500
Simon:
 
>> Is there a downside to always having ldirectord running on both
>> load balancers?
> IMHO, no, its just a matter of taste.

I think inittab with a respawn will be a more robust solution
since it will restart the process if it dies.

Is there any problem of using an inittab respawn on
the heartbeat process as well?

Thanks, 
        Neil


--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://UnmeteredVPS.net/centos
Virtual private server with CentOS 5.5 preinstalled
Unmetered bandwidth = no overage charges 


_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>