LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: VS/TUN + Transparent Proxy Success [was Re: Horm's method (REDIRECT

To: Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: VS/TUN + Transparent Proxy Success [was Re: Horm's method (REDIRECT)]
Cc: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 12:02:57 +0200 (EET)
        Hi Wensong,

On Sat, 15 Jan 2000, Wensong Zhang wrote:

> Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > 
> >         In http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/VS-IPTunneling.html just
> > after the 2nd picture there is a statement which must be corrected:
> > 
> > [
> > their tunnel devices are all configured as
> > <Virtual IP Address>, like "ifconfig tunl0 <Virtual IP Address>"
> > ]
> > 
> >         There is no such limitation for Linux 2.2
> > 
> 
> Yeah, there is no such limitation. I will change it to "The VIP may be
> configured on the tunnel device; the tunnel device is configured up,
> and the VIP can be can be configured on any alias of non-arp device or
> the system is configured to redirect packets for VIP to a local
> socket." Does it make more sense? :-)
> 

        Sounds good :)

> >         At the end of the document the info for Linux 2.2 must be
> > updated too: we have more examples for tunnel setup.
> > 
> 
> OK, I will add more examples in it, and the VS/DR page too.
> 

        OK. An example for tunl device setup with transparent proxy will
be very useful.

Thanks.

Julian Anastasov

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>