LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: IPVS Benchmarking

To: Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPVS Benchmarking
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 01:24:27 -0800
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 06:48:18PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> 
>       Hi,
> 
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Horms wrote:
> 
> > This may be a silly question, but other than using NAT, which has
> > performance problems, is this possible. I tried this topology
> > with direct routing and packets from the clients were multiplexed
> > to the servers fine, but return packets from the servers to the
> > client were not routed by the IPVS box.
> 
>       Why do you think that NAT is so slow? Any benchmarks?

Not yet, I am hoping to be able to get some numbers next week.

-- 
Horms

----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>