LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: IPVS Benchmarking

To: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPVS Benchmarking
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Wayne <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 08:26:48 -0800
Would more memory and faster CPU help?  Say 600Mhz PIII
and 512MB ram, would that make it fast enough for your test?

At 01:24 AM 1/12/00 -0800, Horms wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 06:48:18PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > 
> >       Hi,
> > 
> > On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Horms wrote:
> > 
> > > This may be a silly question, but other than using NAT, which has
> > > performance problems, is this possible. I tried this topology
> > > with direct routing and packets from the clients were multiplexed
> > > to the servers fine, but return packets from the servers to the
> > > client were not routed by the IPVS box.
> > 
> >       Why do you think that NAT is so slow? Any benchmarks?
>
>Not yet, I am hoping to be able to get some numbers next week.
>
>-- 
>Horms
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>