LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: FW: LVS-Tun and Fwmarks

To: "Julian Anastasov" <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: FW: LVS-Tun and Fwmarks
Cc: "Joseph Mack" <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>, <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Horms" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jeff" <golfer2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:15:02 -0400
Ok, I understand.

So something like:

 iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -s 90.0.0.35/32 -j DROP
 iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -s 90.0.0.35/32 -j DROP

on the director should plug the hole on the external side?


-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Anastasov [mailto:ja@xxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:30 PM
To: Jeff
Cc: Joseph Mack; lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Horms
Subject: RE: FW: LVS-Tun and Fwmarks



        Hello,

On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Jeff wrote:

> Hmmm.  I don't understand.
>
> I still have Source Route Verification turned on on the Director.  The VIP
> resides on the real servers only, on their respective tunl0 device.  In
this
> setup, where is the spoof coming in?

        Only if 90.0.0.30/24 is on eth1, not on eth0. Of course,
your setup in the first posting is ambiguous. I don't see the
IP and routing rules. I hope everything is going well. You can
check it with:

ip route get from 90.0.0.35 to 90.0.0.35 iif eth0

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>