LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Linux Director Reliability

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Linux Director Reliability
From: Alexander Marx <mad-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:45:55 +0200
Horms wrote:
Hi,

I am looking for information from people who are running LVS in
production. I am most interested in how reliable they find
LVS to be. How often does the system go down. And when it does
what is the cause - if it is caused by something unrelated
to LVS like faulty hardware then you can skip that bit.


hm .. we 've a setup here at work w/ lvs-nat on two ibm x305 boxen
running lvs-1.1.7 currently on linux 2.6.0-test5 (debian/woody)

We have ~30 VIPs on six gigE interfaces .. traffic accross all
interfaces averages at 15000 packets/s .. there is also an
iproute2 setup in place.

so far we've encountered no stability issues wrt/ lvs, its
rock solid, even the (carefully selected ;-) devel-versions.

the only problems so far were ..

a) constantly hitting connection-tracker limits
b) connection-syncronization with the second node does not seem
   to work in our current setup (results in kernel-oopses)
c) mon is not exactly "intelligent" when it comes
   to monitoring hundreds of services .. (it then puts quite
   some (artificial?) load on the director)

and a subjective observation

d) if the setup reaches a certain level of complexity (especially
   w/ the iproute2 stuff) .. debugging and troubleshooting becomes
   a "non-trivial" task .. and it then sometimes can happen
   that even ten eyes overlook a typo in the config ;-)

otherwise lvs rocks; kudos to the developers :-)

regards,
alex.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>